Commonwealth Treaty
In response, the State of things, emerged after the Treaty of Versailles in 1918, had been extended by you world the need for Governments to intervene in economic activities, attentive imbalances of all kinds that rambling the workings of the market economy, in reality distorted by monopolistic behaviour. The position more extreme was obviously the Soviet Russia. In such a climate it aflorarian German national socialism, Italian fascism and some similar schemes. All that happening would be reflected in the countries that were then not called Latin America. The same dominant sectors in these countries, which had amassed their fortunes under the protection of the British Pax, ceased to apply the benefits of free trade and market pragmatically went on to defend their interests, through the creation of State agencies that protect them. We then were all Socialists, says an author of the era (Vilanova).
The mess generated at the time (which both makes us remember what we are having these hours), I have to restructuring, to give answers to a multilateral system which had collapsed. Thus the declining England clinched its Commonwealth, through a Convention that would reinforce their financial economic ties with its system of colonies, which had not yet disintegrated, if it is ever did so).This was formalized through a treaty signed in Ottawa. Of course as the Argentina, it wasn’t of the Comonwealth member right, it implied that you stood outside of the alleged advantages of that Treaty. Is why President Justo, sent his Vice President, son of Julio Argentino Roca, to negotiate a treaty with the British. This has been extremely amplified by the thinkers of the so-called Argentine nationalism. But what that current not reported, is that in its pragmatism (that was aimed in all directions, since also started copied actions of the New Deal of Roosevelt), just sent to Ezequiel Ramos Mexia, the Italy of Mussolini, also to negotiate a Bilateral Treaty.